<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nun-o &#124; New Useful Non-Obvious &#187; Patent Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nun-o.com/tag/patent-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nun-o.com</link>
	<description>Talking about Intellectual Property</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Law Round-UP</title>
		<link>http://nun-o.com/2009/05/22/patent-law-round-up/</link>
		<comments>http://nun-o.com/2009/05/22/patent-law-round-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robsuarez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In re Bilski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSR v. Teleflex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nun-o.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia As in all areas of Law, Patent Law evolves over time and is molded by cases decided in the Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit Courts.  According to &#8220;Patent Law and Practice, Sixth Edition&#8221; by Herbert F. Schwartz and Robert J. Goldman, here are the major cases currently impacting patent law: In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="display: block; margin: 1em;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:US_Supreme_Court_%2835650678%29.jpg"><img title="When the seat of the federal government was tr..." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a8/US_Supreme_Court_%2835650678%29.jpg/300px-US_Supreme_Court_%2835650678%29.jpg" alt="When the seat of the federal government was tr..." width="300" height="225" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:US_Supreme_Court_%2835650678%29.jpg">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>As in all areas of Law, <a class="zem_slink" title="Patent" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent">Patent Law</a> evolves over time and is molded by cases decided in the <a class="zem_slink" title="Supreme court" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_court">Supreme Court</a> and the <a class="zem_slink" title="United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" rel="homepage" href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/">Federal Circuit</a> Courts.  According to &#8220;<a href="http://storefront.bnabooks.com/epages/bnastore.sf/bnastore.sf/?ObjectPath=/Shops/bnastore/Products/1712" target="_blank">Patent Law and Practice, Sixth Edition</a>&#8221; by <a onclick="window.open('http://storefront.bnabooks.com/WebRoot/Store/Shops/bnastore/pdf/plp6Aboutauthors.pdf','PopUp','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,toolbar=yes,status=yes,width=500,height=500,left='+(screen.availWidth/2-250)+',top='+(screen.availHeight/2-250)+'');return false;" href="http://storefront.bnabooks.com/WebRoot/Store/Shops/bnastore/pdf/plp6Aboutauthors.pdf"><span style="color: #005f95;">Herbert F. Schwartz</span></a> and <a onclick="window.open('http://storefront.bnabooks.com/WebRoot/Store/Shops/bnastore/pdf/plp6AboutAuthors.pdf','PopUp','scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,toolbar=yes,status=yes,width=500,height=500,left='+(screen.availWidth/2-250)+',top='+(screen.availHeight/2-250)+'');return false;" href="http://storefront.bnabooks.com/WebRoot/Store/Shops/bnastore/pdf/plp6AboutAuthors.pdf"><span style="color: #005f95;">Robert J. Goldman</span></a>, here are the major cases currently impacting patent law:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130%20order.pdf" target="_blank">In re Bilski (2008, Fed. Cir. en banc),</a> in which the Federal Circuit established a new standard for the patentability of business method processes and algorithms.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/05-130.pdf" target="_blank"><em>eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC</em> (2006,S.Ct.), </a>in which the Supreme Court overturned the test applied by the Federal Circuit relating to the availability of permanent injunctions in patent litigation</li>
<li><a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-608.pdf" target="_blank"><em>MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.</em> (2007, S.Ct),</a> in which the Supreme Court expanded the availability of <a class="zem_slink" title="Declaratory ruling" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaratory_ruling">declaratory judgment</a> jurisdiction for companies seeking to challenge the patent of another</li>
<li><a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/04-1350.pdf" target="_blank"><em>KSR Int’l v. Teleflex, Inc.</em>, (2007, S.Ct),</a> in which the Supreme Court revisited the law of invalidity for obviousness for the first time in a generation, revising the standard applied by the Federal Circuit since the 1980s</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/M830.pdf" target="_blank"><em>In re Seagate Tech., LLC</em> (2007, Fed. Cir<em>. en banc</em>),</a> in which the Federal Circuit reversed 24 years of decisions and established a new standard for assessing willful <a class="zem_slink" title="Patent infringement" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_infringement">infringement</a>, a precursor to an award of increased damages and attorneys&#8217; fees Critical new issues addressed.</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=cf8c04bf-ed41-423b-bdd1-b2be14b8d1ec" alt="" /><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nun-o.com/2009/05/22/patent-law-round-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suarez&#124;IP Law</title>
		<link>http://nun-o.com/2009/05/21/suarezip-law/</link>
		<comments>http://nun-o.com/2009/05/21/suarezip-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robsuarez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers and Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nun-o.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m pleased to announce that I&#8217;ve launched Suarez&#124;IP Law for your patent prosecution needs. Click the link or call me at 1.305.600.2460 for more information.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-27" title="suareziplaw_logo" src="http://nun-o.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/suareziplaw_logo-300x153.jpg" alt="suareziplaw_logo" width="300" height="153" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m pleased to announce that I&#8217;ve launched <a href="http://www.suareziplaw.com" target="_blank">Suarez|IP Law</a> for your patent prosecution needs. Click the link or call me at 1.305.600.2460 for more information.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=77dab749-210c-40c3-ae55-fc3fb5013f7a" alt="" /><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nun-o.com/2009/05/21/suarezip-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life after the Patent Bar Exam</title>
		<link>http://nun-o.com/2009/01/13/life-after-the-patent-bar-exam/</link>
		<comments>http://nun-o.com/2009/01/13/life-after-the-patent-bar-exam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robsuarez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nun-o.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I did it&#8230; I passed the Patent Bar Exam!!! Officially known as the Examination for Registration to Practice in Patent Cases Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office,  the Patent Bar Exam is a 100 question, six-hour long behemoth with a 50% pass rate.  Having passed it, I am now &#8220;pending registration&#8221; by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I did it&#8230; I passed the Patent Bar Exam!!!</p>
<p>Officially known as the <em>Examination for Registration to Practice in Patent Cases Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office</em>,  the Patent Bar Exam is a 100 question, six-hour long behemoth with a 50% pass rate.  Having passed it, I am now &#8220;pending registration&#8221; by the USPTO.  Basically, there is an oath and some money that I own them, but in approximately 7 weeks I should receive my registration number, then I can officially represent clients before the USPTO in patent cases.  Since I have not passed a state bar exam yet (pending graduating with my JD around 2011), I will be classified as a Patent Agent.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=2cec4589-dacc-4057-b0d7-1a11651415e4" alt="" /><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nun-o.com/2009/01/13/life-after-the-patent-bar-exam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

